OnTheIssuesLogo

John Boozman on Corporations

Republican Representative (AR-3)

 


Tax cuts for higher income helps small business owners

The two disagreed over the tax cuts that were instituted under former President George W. Bush, with Lincoln calling for extending the cuts for low to moderate income taxpayers.

Lincoln, however, said that extending the tax cuts for the wealthy should only be done if it can be paid for. "The ultrawealthy, I do not think should receive that tax cut unless it is paid for in a responsible way, and that's an important thing we have Boozman said he supports extending all of the tax cuts and said that not extending them for the higher income taxpayers would hurt small business owners. "The last thing we need to do in this economy is raise expenses on small businesses, especially on small businesses that are making money," Boozman said. "That makes no sense at all."

Source: Associated Press coverage of 2010 Arkansas Senate debate , Sep 10, 2010

Voted NO on letting shareholders vote on executive compensation.

Congressional Summary:

Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act: Amends the Securities Exchange Act to require that any proxy for an annual shareholders meeting provide for a separate shareholder vote to approve executive compensation for named executive officers. The shareholder vote shall not be:

  1. binding on the corporation
  2. construed as overruling a board decision, or as creating or implying any additional fiduciary duty by the board; or
  3. construed as restricting or limiting shareholder ability to place executive compensation proposals within proxy materials.

Proponent's argument to vote Yes:Rep. BARNEY FRANK (D, MA-4): The amount of wages is irrelevant to the SEC. What this bill explicitly aims at is the practice whereby people are given bonuses that pay off if the gamble pays off, but don't lose you anything if it doesn't. That is, there is a wide consensus that this incentivizes excessive risk.

Opponent's argument to vote No:Rep. SPENCER BACHUS (R, AL-6): True, the first 6 pages of the bill give the owners, the shareholders, a non-binding vote on the pay of top executives. But then come the next 8 pages, the switch, which gives the regulators the power to decide appropriate compensation for not only just top executives but for all employees of all financial institutions above $1 billion in assets and all without regard for the shareholders' prior approval. So under the guise of empowering shareholders, it is, in fact, the government that is empowered. And, finally, on page 15, the bill designates those same government entities which regulated AIG, Countrywide, and collectively failed to prevent the worst financial calamity since the Great Depression. This bill continues the Democrat majority's tendency to go to the default solution for every problem: create a government bureaucracy to make decisions better left to private citizens and private corporations.

Reference: Say-On-Pay Bill; Bill H.R.3269 ; vote number 2009-H686 on Jul 31, 2009

Voted YES on more funding for nanotechnology R&D and commercialization.

Congressional Summary:Extends funding for research and development topics, nanotechnology, project commercialization, prioritization of applications, and federal administration and oversight.

Proponent's argument to vote Yes:Rep. NYDIA VELÁZQUEZ (D, NY-12): We need jobs that cannot be shipped overseas and will not evaporate in the next cycle of boom and bust. But those jobs aren't going to appear out of thin air. They need to be created. By expanding existing industries and unlocking new ones, H.R. 2965 will generate the jobs we need. Job creation is the primary goal of R&D. But in order to generate new positions, we have to first develop new industries. Commercialization is critical to that process.

Opponent's argument to vote No:Rep. ED MARKEY (D, MA-7): I must oppose this bill because I have serious concerns about allowing SBIR awards to go to an unlimited number of businesses owned or controlled by venture capital (VC) firms. The SBIR program, responsible for over 60,000 patents, has always focused on innovation from truly small businesses for whom commercial capital market funding is typically not an option. However, with the change made in this bill, the SBIR program would be wide open to applicants that already are well-capitalized due to VC participation, crowding out the small businesses that have been the focus of the highly successful SBIR program.

While I support VC participation in the SBIR program, enabling an unlimited amount of large VC majority-owned firms to qualify for SBIR funding calls into question whether this program, intended for genuinely small businesses, is, in fact, still focused on these firms.

We should do everything in our power to strengthen small businesses that generate 70% of new jobs in our country. H.R 2965 does not do enough to ensure that small businesses are the focus of the SBIR program, and therefore I cannot support the bill.

Reference: Enhancing Small Business Research and Innovation Act; Bill S.1233&H.R.2965 ; vote number 2009-H486 on Jul 8, 2009

Voted YES on allowing stockholder voting on executive compensation.

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to provide shareholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation [and as part of that process, fully disclosing executive compensation].

Proponents support voting YES because:

We should not deprive the public, the stockholders, from being able to do anything meaningful once they find out about scandalous levels of executive compensation or board compensation. Everyone talks about the corporate board as the remedy. But the board is often a part of the problem, being paid huge amounts of money for showing up once or twice a year at meetings.

Give the stockholders a meaningful remedy. Once you get the mandatory disclosure put in place by previous legislation, we are saying the stockholders should be allowed to have a referendum on that and not have a runaround by the board.

Opponents support voting NO because:

This vote is based on mischaracterization--it is an unnecessary amendment. The opportunity for these kinds of votes already exists within the structure of corporate governance right now. A good company from Georgia, AFLAC, went ahead and already has these nonbinding shareholder votes. But there is a difference between having individuals in the private sector, shareholders and individuals outside of the mandating of government to have it occur and have government come in with its heavy hand and say, this is exactly what you need to do because we know best. Our constituents know better how to act and how to relate to corporations than Washington.

Reference: Shareholder Vote on Executive Compensation Act; Bill H R 1257 ; vote number 2007-244 on Apr 20, 2007

Voted YES on replacing illegal export tax breaks with $140B in new breaks.

Vote to pass a bill that would repeal an export tax break for U.S. manufacturers ruled an illegal trade subsidy by the World Trade Organization, while providing for about $140 billion in new corporate tax cuts. Revenue raising offsets would decrease the cost of the bill to $34.4 billion over 11 years. It would consist of a buyout for tobacco farmers that could not go over $9.6 billion. It also would allow the IRS to hire private collection agencies to get back money from taxpayers, and require individuals who claim a tax deduction for a charitable donation of a vehicle to obtain an independent appraisal of the car.
Reference: American Jobs Creation Act; Bill HR 4520 ; vote number 2004-259 on Jun 17, 2004

Rated 97% by the US COC, indicating a pro-business voting record.

Boozman scores 97% by US Chamber of Commerce on business policy

Whether you own a business, represent one, lead a corporate office, or manage an association, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of AmericaSM provides you with a voice of experience and influence in Washington, D.C., and around the globe.

Our members include businesses of all sizes and sectors—from large Fortune 500 companies to home-based, one-person operations. In fact, 96% of our membership encompasses businesses with fewer than 100 employees.

Mission Statement:

"To advance human progress through an economic, political and social system based on individual freedom, incentive, initiative, opportunity, and responsibility."
The ratings are based on the votes the organization considered most important; the numbers reflect the percentage of time the representative voted the organization's preferred position.
Source: COC website 03n-COC on Dec 31, 2003

Rated 29% by UFCW, indicating a mixed management/labor voting record.

Boozman scores 29% by UFCW on labor-management issues

The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) is North America's Neighborhood Union--1.3 million members with UFCW locals in all 50 states, Puerto Rico and Canada. Our members work in supermarkets, drug stores, retail stores, meatpacking and meat processing plants, food processing plants, and manufacturing workers who make everything from fertilizer to shoes. We number over 60,000 strong with 25,000 workers in chemical production and 20,000 who work in garment and textile industries.

    The UFCW Senate scorecard is based on these key votes:
  1. American Jobs Act (+)
  2. Balanced Budget Amendment (-)
  3. Rejecting Cut, Cap, and Balance (+)
  4. Repeal Health Care Law (-)
  5. Sen. Am. 14 Wicker Am. to S 223, excluding unionization at TSA (-)
  6. Sen. Am. 740 McCain Am. to HR 2112, defunding TAA (-)
  7. Trade Adjustment Assistance Extension Act (TAA) (+)
Source: UFCW website 12-UFCW-S on May 2, 2012

Regulatory relief for smaller banks stimulates growth.

Boozman voted YEA Banking Bill

Congressional Summary:

Supporting press release from Rep. Tom Emmer (R-MN-6): This legislation will foster economic growth by providing relief to Main Street, tailor regulations for better efficacy, and most importantly it will empower individual Americans and give them more opportunity.

Opposing statement on ProPublica.org from Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY-5): The bill includes many provisions I support: minority-owned banks and credit unions in underserved communities have legitimate regulatory burden concerns. Unfortunately, exempting mortgage disclosures enacted to detect discriminatory practices will only assist the Trump Administration in its overall effort to curtail important civil rights regulations. I simply cannot vote for any proposal that would help this Administration chip away at laws that I and my colleagues worked so hard to enact and preserve.

Legislative outcome: Passed House 258-159-10 on May 22, 2018(Roll call 216); Passed Senate 67-31-2 on March 14, 2018(Roll call 54); Signed by President Trump. May 24, 2018

Source: Congressional vote 16-S2155 on Mar 14, 2018

Reduce corporate tax rates from 35% to 21% to create jobs.

Boozman voted YEA Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Summary by GovTrack.US: (Nov 16, 2017)

Case for voting YES by Heritage Foundation (12/19/17):This is the most sweeping update to the US tax code in more than 30 years. The bill would lower taxes on businesses and individuals and unleash higher wages, more jobs, and untold opportunity through a larger and more dynamic economy. The bill includes many pro-growth features, including a deep reduction in the corporate tax rate, a scaled-back state and local tax deduction, full expensing for five years, and lower individual tax rates.

Case for voting NO by Sierra Club (11/16/17): Republicans have passed a deeply regressive tax plan that will result in painful cuts to core domestic programs, to give billionaires and corporate polluters tax cuts while making American families pay the price. Among the worst provisions:

  • This plan balloons the federal deficit by over $1.5 trillion. Cutting taxes for the rich now means cuts to the federal budget and entitlements later.
  • The bill hampers the booming clean energy economy by ending tax credits for the purchase of electric vehicles and for wind and solar energy.
  • The bill opens up the Arctic Refuge to drilling, a thinly veiled giveaway to the fossil fuel industry.

    Legislative outcome: Passed House, 224-201-7, roll call #699 on 12/20; passed Senate 51-48-1, roll call #323 on 12/20; signed by Pres. Trump on 12/22.

    Source: Congressional vote 17-HR1 on Nov 16, 2017

    Other candidates on Corporations: John Boozman on other issues:
    AR Gubernatorial:
    Anthony Bland
    Asa Hutchinson
    Frank Gilbert
    Jared Henderson
    Leslie Rutledge
    Mark West
    Mike Beebe
    Mike Huckabee
    Mike Ross
    Ricky Dale Harrington
    Sarah Huckabee Sanders
    Tim Griffin
    AR Senatorial:
    Conner Eldridge
    Curtis Coleman
    Frank Gilbert
    Josh Mahony
    Mike Beebe
    Ricky Dale Harrington
    Tom Cotton

    AR politicians
    AR Archives
    Senate races 2021-22:
    AK: Incumbent Lisa Murkowski(R)
    vs.Challenger Kelly Tshibaka(R)
    AL: Incumbent Richard Shelby(R)
    vs.U.S. Rep. Mo Brooks(R)
    vs.Ambassador Lynda Blanchard(R)
    vs.State Rep. John Merrill(R)
    AR: Incumbent John Boozman(R)
    vs.Candidate Dan Whitfield(D)
    AZ: Incumbent Mark Kelly(D)
    vs.Sen. Kelli Ward(? R)
    vs.CEO Jim Lamon(R)
    vs.Challenger Blake Masters(R)
    CA: Incumbent Alex Padilla(D)
    vs.State Rep. Jerome Horton(D ?)
    vs.House nominee James Bradley(R)
    CO: Incumbent Michael Bennet(D)
    vs.USAF Lt. Darryl Glenn(R)
    CT: Incumbent Richard Blumenthal(D)
    vs.Challenger Joe Visconti(R)
    FL: Incumbent Marco Rubio(R)
    vs.U.S.Rep. Val Demings(D)
    vs.U.S. Rep. Alan Grayson(D)
    vs.U.S. Rep. Stephanie Murphy(D ?)
    GA: Incumbent Raphael Warnock(D)
    vs.Navy vet Latham Saddler(R)
    vs.Appointed Senator Kelly Loeffler(R ?)
    HI: Incumbent Brian Schatz(D)
    vs.Former State Rep. Cam Cavasso(R ?)
    IA: Incumbent Chuck Grassley(R)
    vs.State Sen. Jim Carlin(R)
    vs.U.S. Rep. Cindy Axne(D ?)
    ID: Incumbent Mike Crapo(R)
    (no prospective opponents yet)
    IL: Incumbent Tammy Duckworth(D)
    vs.U.S.Rep. Adam Kinzinger(? R)
    IN: Incumbent Todd Young(R)
    vs.Challenger Haneefah Abdul-Khaaliq(D)
    KS: Incumbent Jerry Moran(R)
    vs.Secretary of State Mike Pompeo(? R)
    KY: Incumbent Rand Paul(R)
    vs.State Rep Charles Booker(D)
    LA: Incumbent John Kennedy(R)
    vs.Gov. John Bel Edwards(D ?)

    MD: Incumbent Chris Van Hollen(D)
    (no prospective opponents yet)
    MO: Incumbent Roy Blunt(R)
    vs.Gov. Eric Greitens(R)
    vs.State Sen. Scott Sifton(D)
    vs.Treasurer Eric Schmitt(R)
    vs.Marine Officer Lucas Kunce(D)
    NC: Incumbent Richard Burr(R,retiring)
    vs.State Sen. Erica Smith(D)
    vs.U.S.Rep. Mark Walker(R)
    vs.Challenger Ted Budd(R)
    vs.Gov. Pat McCrory(R)
    vs.Justice Cheri Beasley(D)
    ND: Incumbent John Hoeven(R)
    (no prospective opponents yet)
    NH: Incumbent Maggie Hassan(D)
    vs.Brig.Gen. Don Bolduc(R)
    vs.Gov. Chris Sununu(R ?)
    vs.Former Senator Kelly Ayotte(R ?)
    NV: Incumbent Catherine Cortez Masto(D)
    (no prospective opponents yet)
    NY: Incumbent Chuck Schumer(D)
    vs.Challenger Antoine Tucker(R)
    OH: Incumbent Rob Portman(R,retiring)
    vs.State Rep. Dan Carter(? D)
    vs.U.S.Rep. Tim Ryan(D)
    vs.Challenger Bernie Moreno(R)
    vs.U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan(D)
    vs.OH GOP Chair Jane Timken(R)
    OK: Incumbent James Lankford(R)
    (no prospective opponents yet)
    OR: Incumbent Ron Wyden(D)
    vs.QAnon adherent Jo Rae Perkins(R)
    PA: Incumbent Pat Toomey(R,retiring)
    vs.HSBC whistleblower Everett Stern(R)
    vs.2Lt.Gov.nominee Jeff Bartos(R)
    vs.Commissioner Val Arkoosh(D)
    vs.Ambassador Carla Sands(R)
    vs.Lt. Gov. John Fetterman(D)
    vs.State Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta(D)
    SC: Incumbent Tim Scott(R)
    vs.State Rep. Krystle Matthews(D)
    SD: Incumbent John Thune(R)
    vs.State Rep. Billie Sutton(? D)
    UT: Incumbent Mike Lee(R)
    vs.Challenger Allen Glines(D)
    vs.Challenger Austin Searle(D)
    VT: Incumbent Patrick Leahy(D)
    vs.Lt.Gov. David Zuckerman(? D)
    WA: Incumbent Patty Murray(D)
    vs.Challenger Tiffany Smiley(R)
    WI: Incumbent Ron Johnson(R)
    vs.County Exec. Tom Nelson(D)
    vs.Treasurer Sarah Godlewski(D)
    vs.Sports Exec. Alex Lasry(D)
    Abortion
    Budget/Economy
    Civil Rights
    Corporations
    Crime
    Drugs
    Education
    Energy/Oil
    Environment
    Families
    Foreign Policy
    Free Trade
    Govt. Reform
    Gun Control
    Health Care
    Homeland Security
    Immigration
    Jobs
    Principles
    Social Security
    Tax Reform
    Technology
    War/Peace
    Welfare

    Other Senators
    Senate Votes (analysis)
    Bill Sponsorships
    Affiliations
    Policy Reports
    Group Ratings

    Contact info:
    Email for constituents only
    Fax Number:
    202-225-5713
    Official Website
    Phone number:
    (202) 225-4301
    Search for...





    Page last updated: Jun 10, 2021